![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Phil who?
CV/Resume
What's on my wall?
Tips and insights on leadership, management, customers |
||
The 60 Second Leader™
The book
The learning system
Books
Seven Secrets
Living with Huntington's
The 60 Second Leader™
The Little Book of Leadership
Work with me
Leadership development
Customer focus
Email newsletters
Speaking
Columnist
Some of my work
Corporate Publications
Newspapers & Magazines
Web & Journal Editing
People I like
Anita Roddick
Ricardo Semler
Kjell Nordstrom
Aidan Halligan
Shaun Smith
Marion Janner
Rene Carayol
Happy Henry
Peter Fisk
Chris Daffy
Robert Levering
Gerry Farrelly
Ron Kaufman
Book Reviews
![]() |
The New Leaders: |
For Phil's reviews of this and other books click here.
Site Design by Brom Sulaiman |
Phil's Leadership Blog
16 November 2009
Why case studies shouldn't be taken literally
So, anyway, when I try explaining to colleagues that I have reservations about using case studies as training material because people get hung up in the particularities, the detail, which is non-transferable, and that we should tell stories, yes, about what companies do, but don't be naive enough to think that if you present enough facts, figures, analysis, charts, graphs, cobbled together as a case study then you have done something scientific.
You haven't.
As usual, Seth Godin explains it better than me. They're analogies (stories in other words), stoopid, he says.
Labels: case studies, Enron, Harvard Business Review, Seth Godin
26 October 2009
Letters to the President: keeping in touch with what's real
Labels: customer voice, Obama
07 October 2009
Who are you? In six words or less.
Ernest Hemingway was challenged to write a story in six words and eventually sent this in to the magazine that challenged him to do it:
For sale. Baby shoes. Never worn.
Isn't that evocative, sad, moving, all in just six words?
It's prompted a couple of people since then to use this 'six-word' exercise to focus you sharply on how you see yourself - who you are and how you lead.
The latest is John Baldoni, who in his Harvard Blog, says this:
"Clare Booth Luce once told President Kennedy that "a great man is one sentence." It may feel impossible to sum up your accomplishments in a handful of words but it's a good exercise in self-reflection. Ask yourself what you want to be remembered for, whether you left the organization or the world better than you found it, and how you influenced others. This exercise can guide your decisions about what you want to achieve and help you understand more clearly what work means to you."
I remember Dan Pink doing something similar on his blog recently, prompted by the book "Not quite what I was planning: six word memoirs by writers famous and obscure". He collected a whole load of comments from people summing up their life so far in six words or less.
How you apply it to distilling the essence of how you lead / how you live/ who you are is a neat challenge. What would yours be? Here are a couple of thoughts to start you off:
I'd like my legacy (though that sounds pompous) to be, maybe
"Brought out the best in others."
Or, phrased in terms of my purpose, to...
"Bring out the best in others".
Actually, I really like:
"Extraordinary performance levels from ordinary people"
...as I think that's what we are all here for - to inspire 'ordinary' people to realize they are capable of extraordinary things. That includes ourselves.
But, I also always want to bring out the best in myself (it's lurking in there somewhere), so those words aren't the complete picture. They are also a bit generic and could apply to anyone. Maybe that's the limit of a six-word thing - it won't cover everything.
I had to do a 'three word' exercise once. The profile field I was filling in on an online community said "Three important words." For me, the answer was "No-one is ordinary."
If you apply the six word exercise to famous leaders from history, it's actually easier, as you are summing up their legacy and achievements. So, Baldoni reports that Peggy Noonan, the columnist, says Lincoln's six words would be:
"Preserved the Union. Freed the slaves."
One that popped into my head this morning is Julius Caesar:
"I came. I saw. I conquered."
In Latin it's down to three words - Veni. Vidi. Vici.
So, what about you? Who are you or what do you want your legacy to be - what people would 'label' you as when looking back on you - in six words or less?
Here's the John Baldoni blog to prompt your thinking.
Here's the Dan Pink blog where lots of reader comments contributing their six words should jog your brain cells into coming up with six words for yourself.
Labels: authenticity, common purpose, Dan Pink, Hemingway, John Baldoni, Lincoln
05 October 2009
Why you have to practise leadership
I noticed that on the 'Embodied leadership' course description over at Roffey Park's centre in the UK. I don't think I posted on it here before. Hope not.
It's true isn't it: it's in the doing that we cement the knowing. Leadership talk is not nearly as important as leadership doing.
An additional thought: a psychologist friend of mine who specialises in habits says it takes up to seven weeks of consciously trying a new leadership practice (even something as simple as expressing appreciation) to engrain it as a habit.
Labels: leadership development, leadership practise
02 October 2009
What's the point of life?
- William Osler
Just came across that and it's a reminder of something good leaders know and do - contribute and serve. The ridiculous attempts to save 'bonus cultures' and other old-think approaches to life and the world - "My role in life is to accumulate and consume as much as possible" - that are going on all around us at the moment may be the last throes of a primitivism we are moving away from, with the climate debate prompting us to shift how we think of our lives away from accumulating and consuming.
For leaders, Ken Blanchard puts it this way - That we have too many self-serving leaders and not enough leaders who serve.
It's the move away from a scarcity to an abundance attitude that we are all inching towards (those of us who are comfortably off, that is) - from waking up thinking 'What can I earn/accumulate today to stave off...what, starvation?' to 'What can I contribute today?'
As people know who love their work, when you go out determined to contribute, you find people queuing up to buy your services anyway.
Or I may be a fanciful old hippy.
Labels: climate change, Ken Blanchard, meaning of life, post-consumerism, self-serving leadership, servant leadership
Archives
August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009

The Leadership Race: click to see who wins
Read my blogs
Leadership Blog
Customer Blog
Bring on the dinosaurs
Weird news
Evolution in action
A touch of irony
Virtual shrink
Phi & The Golden Ratio
Bubble wrap
Do not press
Monterey Bay Aquarium
![]() |
Must read
How to change the world
Johnnie Moore
Tom Peters
Seth Godin
Bob Sutton
Jim Clemmer
The Laws of Simplicity
Integration Training Journal
Must click
thehungersite.com
|

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 License.
Site Design by Brom Sulaiman





