<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Phil Dourado &#187; bad customer service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.phildourado.com/tag/bad-customer-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.phildourado.com</link>
	<description>Author, Speaker, Leadership Development, Journalist &#38; Editor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:27:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Does &#8216;big&#8217; mean your customer service has to suck?</title>
		<link>http://www.phildourado.com/2009/11/does-big-mean-your-customer-service-has-to-suck/</link>
		<comments>http://www.phildourado.com/2009/11/does-big-mean-your-customer-service-has-to-suck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA['It's against our policy']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad customer service]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phildourado.com/wordpress/?p=1548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s so often big organizations that let us down on customer service, isn&#8217;t it. Because their policies are too rigid to fit every circumstance, usually. So, if they don&#8217;t allow the frontline to practise common sense, use some discretion, we, as non-standard customers not fitting the policy, don&#8217;t exist and don&#8217;t get served. I&#8217;m thinking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><p>It&#8217;s so often big organizations that let us down on customer service,  isn&#8217;t it. Because their policies are too rigid to fit every  circumstance, usually. So, if they don&#8217;t allow the frontline to practise  common sense, use some discretion, we, as non-standard customers not  fitting the policy, don&#8217;t exist and don&#8217;t get served. I&#8217;m thinking of  the recent case of <a href="http://www.tampabay.com/news/humaninterest/thumbprint-rule-at-tampa-bank-of-america-stymies-armless-man-trying-to/1033012">the  Bank of America customer</a> who was born with no arms, but found  himself standing in front of a cashier who said that no, without a thumb  print, he couldn&#8217;t cash the cheque he wanted to cash. Because that&#8217;s  the policy.</p>
<p>Bill Taylor, in his <a href="http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/taylor/2009/11/sizing_up_jack_welch_is_too_bi.html">Practically  Radical blog</a>, over at Harvard, says that the lesson here is that  size, as a strategy in itself, is no longer enough. Companies get big  because it&#8217;s a sign of success and it gives them the muscle, the clout,  to carry on getting bigger &#8211; their buying power increases, economies of  scale kick in, suppliers offer them favourable prices, competitors can&#8217;t  match their marketing power, blah, blah, blah.</p>
<p>But, says Taylor,  if you haven&#8217;t figured out how to harness the smarts of the loads of  people that work with you, then you are part of the ranks of &#8216;big and  stupid&#8217; companies. And your days are numbered because you aren&#8217;t close  enough to the customer.</p>
<p>Taylor doesn&#8217;t explicitly say this, but  when you get really big, you have enough critical mass in terms of brain  power to be able to do the &#8216;wisdom of crowds&#8217; thing &#8211; as long as you  simplify, streamline, strip out bureaucracy, keep people close to  reality so they aren&#8217;t cushioned from the world by your very size, then  bigger and smarter is what you become.</p>
<p>Only very few big  companies do that. Most remain big and dumb. But, they don&#8217;t care.  Because they think they are big and strong and the odd customer here and  there who doesn&#8217;t fit their &#8216;customer service policy&#8217; doesn&#8217;t matter.  Yeah, right.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nba.com/coachfile/pete_carril/index.html">&#8220;Pete Carril</a>,  the Hall of Fame basketball coach, has a trademark expression that sums  up the relationship between size and success. &#8216;The strong take from the  weak,&#8217; he likes to say, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Smart-Take-Strong-Basketball-Philosophy/dp/068483510X">&#8216;but  the smart take from the strong.&#8217;</a> If you can figure out, as Jack  Welch did, how to add to your company&#8217;s muscles without atrophying its  brain, then maybe you&#8217;re not too big to succeed. But most big-company  leaders, who don&#8217;t share Welch&#8217;s fervor for staying close to customers,  better figure out how to make their organizations smarter — or they will  keep getting weaker.&#8221; &#8211; <a href="http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/taylor/2009/11/sizing_up_jack_welch_is_too_bi.html">Bill  Taylor</a></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-1548"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.phildourado.com/2009/11/does-big-mean-your-customer-service-has-to-suck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

