![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Phil who?
CV/Resume
What's on my wall?
Tips and insights on leadership, management, customers |
||
The 60 Second Leader™
The book
The learning system
Books
Seven Secrets
Living with Huntington's
The 60 Second Leader™
The Little Book of Leadership
Work with me
Leadership development
Customer focus
Email newsletters
Speaking
Columnist
Some of my work
Corporate Publications
Newspapers & Magazines
Web & Journal Editing
People I like
Anita Roddick
Ricardo Semler
Kjell Nordstrom
Aidan Halligan
Shaun Smith
Marion Janner
Rene Carayol
Happy Henry
Peter Fisk
Chris Daffy
Robert Levering
Gerry Farrelly
Ron Kaufman
Working with
![]()
![]()
Leaders in London
Book Reviews
![]() |
The New Leaders: |
For Phil's reviews of this and other books click here.
Site Design by Brom Sulaiman |
Phil's Leadership Blog
08 April 2007
Goodhart's Law : why targets don't work
SOURCE: Central Banking, Monetary Theory and Practice: Essays in honour of Charles Goodhart, page 96. Systems thinking, as practised by Toyota and other high-performing organizations, stresses that target-based systems distort behaviour and make your organization inflexible. John Seddon’s book Freedom From Command & Control is helpful in understanding systems thinking and how you can lead more effectively by using it. Peter Senge's work is also instructive on systems thinking and how it can help you avoid falling into the trap of target-based attempts to lead change.
More on the misuse of targets in attempts at leading change - which is obviously a bug-bear of mine - in The 60 Second Leader, my book, due out April in the UK and June in North America. Damn, I plugged. But, I'm angry about this target nonsense, so researched it and put it in the book. So that plug was based on passion, not self-promotion. Honest.
Labels: targets
Targets, damn targets. Why leading by top-down targets is wrong

This is relevant to leadership and customer issues, so I'll post this in both blogs.
From BBC News today comes another example of how people cheat when they have to work in a target-based performance management system - even with the best intentions and even the most senior people (what, you only expect call centre agents to cheat their targets? Target-based systems distort everything and most people's behaviour).
Again, this one is from the National Health Service, and follows on from sporadic stories of ambulances having to wait outside hospitals with patients in the back (because the Accident and Emergency 'waiting time limit' for patients, imposed by central government, is measured from when they come in through the door, and the hospital would have broken its limit and been penalised if the patients waited inside the hospital for treatment, so they were kept in ambulances).
This isn't evidence of pernicious people. It's brilliant, dedicated people pushed into ludicrous behaviour by top-down target-setting. Top-down targets distort. Check out any of the lean service analysts and consultants to see how flawed the whole thing is. Anyway, here's the latest example of what bad targets do to good people - and the terrible damage it does to the reputation of a much-loved institution:
FROM THE BBC
Patient waiting lists 'manipulated'
Last Updated: Saturday, 07 April 2007, 12:28 GMT
A senior cancer specialist has admitted giving patients unnecessary treatments to manipulate hospital waiting lists.
Chris Hamilton, consultant clinical oncologist at Hull's Princess Royal Hospital, told the BBC the problem was a government requirement that all treatment began within 31 days of diagnosis.
He says it means some low-risk patients are being treated before more urgent cases.
Mr Hamilton told the BBC he had given some prostate cancer patients hormone therapy to move them down the waiting list.
He said: "You're caught in a bind. Either you give them unnecessary treatment with hormones and reclassify them or you put them to the front of the queue where they shouldn't really be."
He added that he knew other hospitals were carrying out a similar practice and he had informed national cancer director Mike Richards.
The Prostate Cancer Charity condemned Mr Hamilton's claims saying it was "deeply unethical" to give patients treatment they did not need.
Dr Chris Hiley, head of policy and research, said: "It would be totally unacceptable if hormone treatment were being prescribed for men with prostate cancer simply in order to meet treatment target times - when it is not required to treat their cancer.
"It has nothing to do with patient centred care or good medicine.
"When men are diagnosed with prostate cancer, they need personal support and timely treatment. Providing the wrong treatment to meet NHS targets shows no regard for what patients need - the right treatment given at the right time with care and respect."
Labels: lean service, targets
Archives
August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008

The Leadership Race: click to see who wins
Read my blogs
Leadership Blog
Customer Blog
Bring on the dinosaurs
Weird news
Evolution in action
A touch of irony
Virtual shrink
Phi & The Golden Ratio
Bubble wrap
Do not press
Monterey Bay Aquarium
![]() |
Must read
How to change the world
Johnnie Moore
Tom Peters
Seth Godin
Bob Sutton
Jim Clemmer
The Laws of Simplicity
Must click
thehungersite.com
|

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 License.
Site Design by Brom Sulaiman





